CS369E: Communication Complexity (for Algorithm Designers) Lecture #3: Lower Bounds for Compressive Sensing∗
نویسنده
چکیده
We begin with an appetizer before starting the lecture proper — an example that demonstrates that randomized one-way communication protocols can sometimes exhibit surprising power. It won’t surprise you that the Equality function — with f(x,y) = 1 if and only if x = y — is a central problem in communication complexity. It’s easy to prove, by the Pigeonhole Principle, that its deterministic one-way communication complexity is n, where n is the length of the inputs x and y. What about its randomized communication complexity? Recall from last lecture that by default, our randomized protocols can use public coins and can have two-sided error , where is any constant less than 1 2 .
منابع مشابه
Communication Complexity (for Algorithm Designers)
Preface The best algorithm designers prove both possibility and impossibility results — both upper and lower bounds. For example, every serious computer scientist knows a collection of canonical NP-complete problems and how to reduce them to other problems of interest. Communication complexity offers a clean theory that is extremely useful for proving lower bounds for lots of different fundamen...
متن کاملComplexity ( for Algorithm Designers ) Lecture # 1 : Data Streams : Algorithms and Lower Bounds ∗
This class is mostly about impossibility results — lower bounds on what can be accomplished by algorithms. However, our perspective will be unapologetically that of an algorithm designer. We’ll learn lower bound technology on a “need-to-know” basis, guided by fundamental algorithmic problems that we care about (perhaps theoretically, perhaps practically). That said, we will wind up learning qui...
متن کاملCS 369 E : Communication Complexity ( for Algorithm Designers ) Lecture # 1 : Data Streams : Algorithms and Lower
This class is mostly about impossibility results — lower bounds on what can be accomplished by algorithms. However, our perspective will be unapologetically that of an algorithm designer. We’ll learn lower bound technology on a “need-to-know” basis, guided by fundamental algorithmic problems that we care about (perhaps theoretically, perhaps practically). That said, we will wind up learning qui...
متن کاملCS 369 E : Communication Complexity ( for Algorithm Designers ) Lecture # 9 : Lower Bounds in Property Testing ∗
We first give a brief introduction to the field of property testing. Section 3 gives upper bounds for the canonical property of “monotonicity testing,” and Section 4 shows how to derive property testing lower bounds from communication complexity lower bounds. We won’t need to develop any new communication complexity; our existing toolbox (specifically, Disjointness) is already rich enough to de...
متن کاملCS 369 E : Communication Complexity ( for Algorithm Designers ) Lecture # 8 : Lower Bounds in Property Testing ∗
We begin in this section with a brief introduction to the field of property testing. Section 2 explains the famous example of “linearity testing.” Section 3 gives upper bounds for the canonical problem of “monotonicity testing,” and Section 4 shows how to derive property testing lower bounds from communication complexity lower bounds. These lower bounds will follow from our existing communicati...
متن کامل